This final paper explores crisis communication on regardingon the of the assassination of a famous journalist and editor of a Croatian weekly news magazine; the late Ivo Pukanić. The aim of the final paper is to research all the elements of crisis communication in public relations by analyzing the professional literature, and determine how to research findings relate to the with Krunoslav Borovac, who at the time of the assassination performed the function of the spokesman of the Ministry of Internal affairs.The final paper is divided into five sections, starting with the introductory unit in which the reader is introduced to concepts such as crisis, fur communication, crisis management and most importantly; 3 L. 3L stands for 3 limits (limit who says, what is said and channels trougho which to speak), and is used in crisis situations when there is a lot of information. In the second work of the work, the assassination itself andis the character and activitis of Ivo Pukanić are described. The third part of the final paper discusses the results of the crisis; especially about whether anything changed in legislation after the assassination, and how politicians reacted after the events. The fourth part is the research part in which the interview conducted with the then spokesperson of the Ministry of the Interior is analyzed. Mr. Borovec had the task of daily communication with the channels of traditional media, which can confirm or refute the methods of crisis management described in the introductory paper. Finally, in the fifth unit that makes up the conclusion, views based on the professional literature analysis and the information obtained from the in-depth interview are presented.