prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
undergraduate thesis
Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona
2021. urn:nbn:hr:146:763907
Novaković, Bruno
VERN University

Cite this document

Novaković, B. (2021). Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona (Undergraduate thesis). Zagreb: VERN University . Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

Novaković, Bruno. "Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona." Undergraduate thesis, VERN University , 2021. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

Novaković, Bruno. "Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona." Undergraduate thesis, VERN University , 2021. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

Novaković, B. (2021). 'Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona', Undergraduate thesis, VERN University , accessed 19 April 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

Novaković B. Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona [Undergraduate thesis]. Zagreb: VERN University ; 2021 [cited 2024 April 19] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

B. Novaković, "Retorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona", Undergraduate thesis, VERN University , Zagreb, 2021. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:146:763907

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleRetorička analiza debate „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana Petersona
AuthorBruno Novaković
MentorDavor Stanković (mentor)
GranterVERN University
Zagreb
Defense date and country2021-09-16, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Information and Communication Sciences
Abstract
Retorika i debata uvijek su bila dva usko vezana pojma, od antike pa sve do današnjih dana. Debate se u današnje vrijeme najčešće prenose putem medija kako bi dosegle velik broj gledatelja širom svijeta. Debate nam mogu izreći tko je bolji govornik, slušatelj i tko zna više o glavnoj temi debate. U velikom opsegu one se vode između dva govornika suprotnih mišljenja koji se sastaju kako bi približi svoj pogled ljudima. Svrha ovoga rada je objasniti formate debate, pojam retorike, suvremeno poimanje dobroga govornika i na kraju analizirati debatu pod nazivom „Sreća: kapitalizam protiv marksizma“ između Slavoja Žižeka i Jordana B. Petersona. Analiziranje retoričkih formata, vrsti debata i na kraju sama analiza pokazalo nam je stvari koje su potrebno da bi osoba bila dobar govornik koji može približiti svoje mišljenje publici i u isto vrijeme ju zaintrigirati kako bi ju potakla na daljnje razmišljanje o temi. Osoba koja je dobar govornik ima razvijenu dikciju i gestikulaciju, uspješno upravlja svojom neverbalnom komunikacijom, ima dobar osjećaj za proksemiku, kontrolira svoj tonalitet i poznaje komunikacijski bonton.
Abstract (english)
From ancient days to modern times, rhetorics and debate were often two closlely linked terms. In modern days, debates are mostly transmitted by media so that their message could reach a large number of people all over the world and they can also tell us who is the better speaker, listener, and who knows more about debating themes. In addition, most of the times debates are led between two speakers who have opposite views, with both of them trying to bring their point closer to people. The purpose of this thesis is to explain the format of the debate; what is rhetorics, what constitutes a contemporary understanding of a good speaker and to analyze debate under the name of "Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism" between Slavoj Žižek and Jordan B. Peterson. By analyzing rhetorical formats, types of debates and in the end, the whole debate itself, we got an insight of what it takes for a person to be a good speaker, but also, who as a person can bring their view closer to the audience and at the same time, encourage the audience to think about the particular subject. Good speaker is a person who has perfected diction and gesticulation, successfully manages his or her nonverbal communication, has a good feeling for proxemic, controls his tonality and knows a great deal about communication etiquette.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:146:763907
Study programmeTitle: Public Relations and Media Studies
Study programme type: professional
Study level: undergraduate
Academic / professional title: stručni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) odnosa s javnošću (stručni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) odnosa s javnošću)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-11-25 14:48:32